Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | SAP | Test Management Tools
6 April, 2021

Solution Manager: 4 Reasons it’s NOT a Test Tool

Solution Manager is Not a Test Tool

I’ve been an SAP test professional for well over a decade. During this time, I’ve seen a few iterations of Solution Manager (SolMan), and each one has given me cause to shudder. In this insight, I’m going to look at 4 reasons why SolMan is not a test tool.

What is SolMan?

Firstly, what is SolMan? It’s a core module within any recent SAP implementation. It’s your license server. It gives SAP a window into your implementation, and it does offer a test suite… but not one I would recommend.

What is a test tool?

Simply put, a test tool is something that makes testing easier. Tools like Micro Focus ALM QC for example, accelerate testing by providing a centralised, easy to use and agnostic interface. 

Why Solution Manager is Not a Test Tool

For years, SAP have been pushing various free test tools. These include CATT, eCATT, Component Based Test Automation (CBTA), Test Workbench and Test Suite. Latterly, these tools integrate with the Business Process Change Analyzer, Scope and Effort Analyzer and the Test Automation Framework. 

SolMan does sound like a perfect solution – especially as SAP loves to talk it up.

Reading their names is enough to whet even the most stubborn appetites and you’d be forgiven for buying into the concepts. I mean, who doesn’t want a suite of free tools that can analyse changes, and automate tests? Well, unfortunately, the reality is somewhat less compelling than the messaging.

 SolMan just isn’t a test tool. It does not make testing easier. In fact, it adds complexity, restricts visibility, slows processes. SolMan will divide your solution and fragment your team.

Testing with Solution Manager – 4 Problems You Will Face

1. Solution Manager Creates More Work

Business Process Change Analyzer is touted as a major benefit of SolMan testing. Unfortunately configuring this is ridiculously complex and time consuming.

Before you use any of this functionality, you must ‘have configured the business processes, and created a TBOM for every relevant executable entity

I’ve worked on 20+ SAP implementations. None of them have done this. If you’ve ever tried this, you’ll know how huge an undertaking it is. Make no mistake, configuring Solution Manager Business Requirements is a major project all on its own. If you don’t fully commit to this, BPCA will be completely useless.

2. Solution Manager Restricts Your Visibility

Visibility is key to testing. As a tester your soul responsibility is to assess and communicate the effectiveness of a system against given criteria. Often that can be as simple as a tick or a cross in a box, or it can be as detailed as a defect report or deep dive analysis. A test team needs to communicate all of this.

A test tool makes this process easier. They provide simple linkage between tests and defects, allow easy access to information and dashboards. Test tools give stakeholders the ability to track against milestones, allow your PMO to see development progress, allow delivery teams to easily respond to defects, and let testers know what they need to focus on next.

SolMan limits visibility – It buries your test activity deep within SAP. It prevents easy access to information and in so doing SolMan greatly diminishes test effectiveness.

3. SolMan is Not User Friendly

SolMan is an awkward tool to use, it’s designed by SAP experts for SAP experts. It’s not designed for your end users, your DBAs, your PMs or business analysts… it’s not even designed for your test team.

Granted, test suite (SolMan 7.2) is slightly more user friendly than its predecessor, test workbench. But that’s more a reflection on how truly awful Test Workbench was, rather than an endorsement of Test Suite. 

 It’s a given that testing time is always squeezed. Test teams are always stretched. Ask yourself, do you really have the bandwidth to upskill your team in such a clunky, awkward tool? 

4. SolMan Divides Your Solution and Your Team

Solman divides your team and your software into silos. At a software level, it splits your functionality into SAP and Non-SAP, offering different capabilities for each. This is not reflective of real-world 

business processes which run in and out of your various systems. Test tools like Micro Focus ALM QC treat all systems equally and allow tests to flow throughout your integrated SAP landscape.

Instead of SolMan, Use These Proven SAP Testing Tools

Solution Manager has basic test functionality, but it is not a test tool. SolMan is overly complex, limits visibility, isn’t user-friendly and will actually divide your solution and your team. SolMan has created problematic divisions wherever I’ve seen it used – it divides teams into SAP experts and non-experts.

Decent test tools can integrate with Solution Manager if required, to create requirements mapping and defect/issue synchronisation.

If SAP testing is important to your organisation, you should check out the Micro Focus test tool suite

Micro Focus have over 1700 SAP customers and are the proven SAP testing solution

Get in touch today – Unify Your Team, Accelerate Your SAP Testing

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

6th April 2021
AI for Test Data

How to Implement AI for Test Data: 10 Considerations

Test data has always been one of the slowest, least glamorous parts of software testing. It is rarely strategic work, but it holds everything up. No matter how good your test plan is, weak data can make the whole exercise unreliable.

Choosing Performance

How to Choose a Performance Testing Tool

If you’re looking for a new performance tool or new to performance testing, it can be a tough subject to get your head around. I’ve been involved in the industry for 3 decades, and during that time, it has evolved massively. Increasingly, I talk to people at companies who’ve never

DevWeb is better than JMeter

5 Ways DevWeb Is Better Than JMeter

JMeter often becomes the default because it looks free. There is no license fee, and it appears flexible enough to do almost anything. But JMeter’s ease is often a myth. In reality, it is rarely the most sensible or low-cost choice.

Testing is Vital

Seriously Though, Five Reasons Testing is Vital

In the last main Testing Times edition (April fools day), I argued, quite ludicrously, that testing is a waste of time. That it slows releases, costs money, and ruins everyone’s fun. Judging by the comments, a few readers took it a bit too literally. So let’s be serious for a minute.

Aviator Testing AI

DevOps Aviator: AI Made For Testers

DevOps Aviator brings generative AI into software delivery to help test teams move sooner, reduce manual effort, and get answers faster. It is part of the broader Aviator suite: a set of AI capabilities embedded across OpenText products.

Testing is a waste of time

5 Reasons Testing is a Waste of Time

Let’s be honest, testing is what teams do when they don’t trust their developers. It’s a tax on speed, a relic from waterfall days, and a crutch for people afraid to ship. It just slows down releases, kills creativity, and wastes budget that could be better spent on another sprint.

OpenText Summit 2026

OpenText Summit: Why This Free Event Is Worth Your Time

You walk into a room where people are talking about the exact problems you wrestle with: tricky deployments, clunky processes, and how to test faster. Sometimes, the right conversation with the right person is enough to unlock a solution or a possibility you hadn’t even considered.

Python

Functional Testing 26.1: Adds Python, Cloud Testing, and more AI

With 26.1, OpenText is giving you something concrete: Python‑based automation, AI‑assisted verification, and cloud labs that fit into your existing CI/CD. This turns functional testing from a separate QA activity into a shared capability that developers, SDETs, and testers can all contribute to.

LoadRunner AI

LoadRunner 26.1: A New Direction in Performance Testing?

OpenText’s version 26.1 is a clear statement of where the Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) family is heading: AI-assisted, simplifying complex tasks and enabling your team to be more productive. This creates a very practical question: how do you buy and deploy these new capabilities in a way that actually moves the needle on risk, cost, and delivery speed?

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.