Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | SAP | Test Management Tools
6 April, 2021

Solution Manager: 4 Reasons it’s NOT a Test Tool

Solution Manager is Not a Test Tool

I’ve been an SAP test professional for well over a decade. During this time, I’ve seen a few iterations of Solution Manager (SolMan), and each one has given me cause to shudder. In this insight, I’m going to look at 4 reasons why SolMan is not a test tool.

What is SolMan?

Firstly, what is SolMan? It’s a core module within any recent SAP implementation. It’s your license server. It gives SAP a window into your implementation, and it does offer a test suite… but not one I would recommend.

What is a test tool?

Simply put, a test tool is something that makes testing easier. Tools like Micro Focus ALM QC for example, accelerate testing by providing a centralised, easy to use and agnostic interface. 

Why Solution Manager is Not a Test Tool

For years, SAP have been pushing various free test tools. These include CATT, eCATT, Component Based Test Automation (CBTA), Test Workbench and Test Suite. Latterly, these tools integrate with the Business Process Change Analyzer, Scope and Effort Analyzer and the Test Automation Framework. 

SolMan does sound like a perfect solution – especially as SAP loves to talk it up.

Reading their names is enough to whet even the most stubborn appetites and you’d be forgiven for buying into the concepts. I mean, who doesn’t want a suite of free tools that can analyse changes, and automate tests? Well, unfortunately, the reality is somewhat less compelling than the messaging.

 SolMan just isn’t a test tool. It does not make testing easier. In fact, it adds complexity, restricts visibility, slows processes. SolMan will divide your solution and fragment your team.

Testing with Solution Manager – 4 Problems You Will Face

1. Solution Manager Creates More Work

Business Process Change Analyzer is touted as a major benefit of SolMan testing. Unfortunately configuring this is ridiculously complex and time consuming.

Before you use any of this functionality, you must ‘have configured the business processes, and created a TBOM for every relevant executable entity

I’ve worked on 20+ SAP implementations. None of them have done this. If you’ve ever tried this, you’ll know how huge an undertaking it is. Make no mistake, configuring Solution Manager Business Requirements is a major project all on its own. If you don’t fully commit to this, BPCA will be completely useless.

2. Solution Manager Restricts Your Visibility

Visibility is key to testing. As a tester your soul responsibility is to assess and communicate the effectiveness of a system against given criteria. Often that can be as simple as a tick or a cross in a box, or it can be as detailed as a defect report or deep dive analysis. A test team needs to communicate all of this.

A test tool makes this process easier. They provide simple linkage between tests and defects, allow easy access to information and dashboards. Test tools give stakeholders the ability to track against milestones, allow your PMO to see development progress, allow delivery teams to easily respond to defects, and let testers know what they need to focus on next.

SolMan limits visibility – It buries your test activity deep within SAP. It prevents easy access to information and in so doing SolMan greatly diminishes test effectiveness.

3. SolMan is Not User Friendly

SolMan is an awkward tool to use, it’s designed by SAP experts for SAP experts. It’s not designed for your end users, your DBAs, your PMs or business analysts… it’s not even designed for your test team.

Granted, test suite (SolMan 7.2) is slightly more user friendly than its predecessor, test workbench. But that’s more a reflection on how truly awful Test Workbench was, rather than an endorsement of Test Suite. 

 It’s a given that testing time is always squeezed. Test teams are always stretched. Ask yourself, do you really have the bandwidth to upskill your team in such a clunky, awkward tool? 

4. SolMan Divides Your Solution and Your Team

Solman divides your team and your software into silos. At a software level, it splits your functionality into SAP and Non-SAP, offering different capabilities for each. This is not reflective of real-world 

business processes which run in and out of your various systems. Test tools like Micro Focus ALM QC treat all systems equally and allow tests to flow throughout your integrated SAP landscape.

Instead of SolMan, Use These Proven SAP Testing Tools

Solution Manager has basic test functionality, but it is not a test tool. SolMan is overly complex, limits visibility, isn’t user-friendly and will actually divide your solution and your team. SolMan has created problematic divisions wherever I’ve seen it used – it divides teams into SAP experts and non-experts.

Decent test tools can integrate with Solution Manager if required, to create requirements mapping and defect/issue synchronisation.

If SAP testing is important to your organisation, you should check out the Micro Focus test tool suite

Micro Focus have over 1700 SAP customers and are the proven SAP testing solution

Get in touch today – Unify Your Team, Accelerate Your SAP Testing

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

6th April 2021
The evolution of test management tools

Test Management Tools: Past, Present, and Future

Understanding where things have come from can often help inform where they are going. The story of test management tools goes back at least three decades and this insight offers a precis of their past, present, and future…

5 automation trends

Software Test Automation: 5 Important Trends for 2024

Software test automation has evolved massively over the last few years; gone are the days of flaky tools, gargantuan setup effort, and scripts that require constant human intervention. The integration of cutting-edge technologies and methodologies has redefined the role of test automation within the software development lifecycle.

Automate Everything With One Tool

Software Testing Simplified: Automate Everything With One Tool

With so many software test automation tools to choose from, companies often cherry-pick a suite of low-cost options to test their full landscape. Unfortunately this is highly problematic, adding unnecessary complexity, increasing costs and undoing any of the purported benefits.

UFT One Automation Heavy Lifting

Test Automation: 6 Reasons UFT One is The Only Tool You Need

In the fast-paced world of software development, functional testing is critical to ensure your solutions perform as expected. Unlike manual testing, which is time-consuming and prone to human error, test automation streamlines the testing process, offering a faster, more accurate, cost-effective solution. There is an array of automation tools available, but OpenText UFT One is the standout choice, offering a complete solution for all your needs.

cut testing costs

Cut Software Testing Costs With These Essential Tactics

Balancing rigorous testing with cost-effectiveness is a challenge. You can test too much, take too much time, and spend too much money on testing. Luckily, there are proven ways to refine your testing practices, increase efficiency, and cut your software testing costs.

performance testing is like herding cats

Herding Cats: Performance Testing Strategies for 2024

Performance testing is more challenging than ever. Technology is more complex, customer expectations are higher, and an increasing number of people and departments need to be involved to make performance testing effective. This article shines a light on strategies to help you execute successful performance test cycles in 2024.

skimping on performance test tools

Why Skimping on Performance Tools Is a False Economy

Performance tool cost is likely to be less than 10% of the performance testing budget, yet many still think that slashing this figure saves money. Common sense tells us that if you do not spend on quality tools, you will spend more on people. In this insight, I look at why investment in professional performance test tools is so important.

The Human Cost of Software Failure

Horizon: The Human Cost of Software  Failure

The Post Office Horizon scandal destroyed lives and livelihoods and is rooted in defective software. This insight looks at the scandal from a testing perspective and serves as a cautionary tale for all involved in deploying large-scale IT systems.

LoadRunner Cloud Migration

Remote Testing with LoadRunner Might Be Breaching Your Contract

Did you know that most LoadRunner Professional licenses are only valid for a specific location? This means that (unless you’ve bought the country or worldwide usage add-on) working from home, other offices or geographic locations is prohibited and doing so could incur financial penalties.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.