Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | How to | Insights Featured
26 November, 2024

OpenText Customer? Read This to Avoid Overpaying for Support Costs

Following its acquisition of Micro Focus, OpenText has implemented a more stringent policy regarding support renewals and term/subscription renewals.

This policy could increase your support costs.

Today I’ll explain how to minimise costs when renewing your OpenText software support or subscriptions.

Support for Outdated Releases

OpenText is enforcing a policy that impacts users running older versions of their software:

  • Users on unsupported releases face additional support charges.
  • This uplift in support will cost you approximately 20% more.

Staying current with your software versions is crucial to avoid these extra charges.

Let’s look at UFT One as an example:

  • OpenText currently support UFT One 2021 and newer. However, UFT One 2021 is not in support for the whole of the next year.
  • Calleo recommends upgrading to the latest release of UFT One to ensure that you avoid this extra charge and benefit from all the new features.
UFT Support Example

Policy Enforcement

While Micro Focus had a similar policy, it wasn’t strictly enforced. OpenText, however, is taking a more rigorous approach and will ask what release you are on as part of the renewal process.

  • If the release is not supported—for the whole of the new support period—you will be charged for extended support at the time of renewal.
  • If you request support while on an unsupported release, OpenText will require the extended support fee.
  • I haven’t heard of additional penalty charges, but there may be some.

This additional charge can be easily avoided by keeping your software up-to-date.

Benefits of Staying Current

Regularly upgrading your test tools offers several advantages:

  1. Access to new features: Older versions may lack helpful new functionality.
  2. Improved Support for the applications you test:  Often,when applications or operating systems get new releases, your test tools must be updated to support the changes.
  3. Improved performance and security: New releases often include important bug fixes and patches.
  4. Compliance with support policies: Avoid additional fees and ensure uninterrupted support.

Recommended Upgrade Frequency

To maximise benefits and minimise risks:

  • Upgrade at least twice a year.
  • Stay informed about the latest releases (see below).
  • Then select What’s New in the Get Started menu.

For example, here is the UFT One What’s New page.

Stay Up to Date with Testing Times

Every month, we publish the latest releases of all the OpenText test tools with links to the online help.

Subscribe to the monthly Testing Times newsletter to view these and keep up-to-date with the latest releases and news.

By staying current with your OpenText software and being aware of these policies, you can ensure uninterrupted support and access to the latest features and avoid unexpected costs.

We can help you stay current and avoid additional costs.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

26th November 2024
Test Automation Hype

Are Test Automation Claims Just Marketing Hype?

Read the marketing collateral from test automation vendors and you’ll encounter bold promises around costs, coverage, and defect reduction. However, for many who have been through multiple automation initiatives, the reality frequently fails to live up to the pitch.

Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse

When Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse!

You’re deep into a project, go-live is rapidly approaching, but there is a mountain of testing to get through. Then, a key stakeholder chimes in, “Let’s just pull more people into testing.” It sounds logical: bigger effort, higher quality. But doubling down on resources can easily lead to chaos, confusion, and worse software quality.

Is Open Source Trustworthy

Do You Trust Open-Source Tools for Enterprise Testing?

Open-source testing tools like JMeter and Selenium have obvious appeal—no licensing fees, endless customisation, and a community to lean on. But, if you’re using open-source for mission-critical testing, you need to ask—is it really worth the risk?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch?

Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.