Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Test Management Tools
28 September, 2021

Jira – Great For Developers, Not Ideal For Testers

Jira is Not Ideal For Testers

Just because you can use Jira for test management, it doesn’t mean you should. Jira is not a test management tool. 

It will end up causing you more problems. 

If you’re running Agile projects, you need to take testing seriously. You need a genuine test tool.

Jira is a Great Agile Management Tool

I am not anti-Jira. Far from it. Jira is a great agile management tool. It lets teams collaborate, allocate work, and monitor progress. 

Jira also offers reasonable bug tracking capabilities – It was a defect management tool first after all.

It’s important that your test tool should integrate with Jira 

If I had to choose an Agile project management tool,  Jira is absolutely the tool I would pick. It’s lean and focused. That’s probably why it’s so successful. 

But a test tool must do much more than Jira can offer.

  • Centralizing your view of testing
  • Scheduling manual and automated runs
  • Capturing exploratory data

These are just a small sample of tasks your test management tool needs to perform.

If you’re running Agile projects, you already know how crucial testing is. You need a test tool that accelerates and improves quality, not one that does the job badly.

It’s Important to Use the Right Tool For the Job

I get the appeal. Jira is already embedded in your teams; everyone knows how to use it. Why not use it for test management? Well, Jira lacks essential test management capability. 

Sure, Jira can cover some elements of test management, at a very basic level. But it will end up wasting your time and effort and using Jira will impact product quality badly.

Here’s a crude example to illustrate the point…

Let’s say you wanted to water a football pitch. You could, in theory, use measuring jugs, but you wouldn’t. It would take a lot of time, and a lot of people. Even with a hundred people though, it wouldn’t get the job done as quickly as a sprinkler system. 

You wouldn’t get complete even coverage. You’d get variations in pouring technique. There’d be wastage, slopping around after filling up. All in all, it’s a bad solution

It’s the same with Jira. No matter how much effort you put into it, you wouldn’t get a perfect solution. It is not an appropriate tool for the job. 

You Should Demand More From A Test Management Tool

A test tool is not just a passive repository for tests and defects. Your test tool should actively help drive software quality.

There are many areas where a test tool can help you, your test team, and your project. I’ve focussed on just a couple of these below:

Test Management Tools Must Give An Overall View of Quality

One of the main things you need from a test management tool is a centralised view of quality.

The ability to not only assess progress but crucially, identify areas of concern. With a genuine test tool like ALM Octane, you can view quality across all your projects in one central dashboard.

From that one central location, you can then drill down into specific projects and further into specific functional areas.  You can drill down into tests that are failing, and the defects that are causing the fails. You can understand which requirements are linked to the failed defects. 

This is all from a single view, without any need for complicated data extraction and compilation. Then you can run a report and distribute to the whole team.

Jira does not give you this capability

Test Management Tools Must Provide Risk-Based Quality Management

Testing is all about risk management. ‘Risk-based testing’ has become a ubiquitous term in software development, but it’s quite misleading. All testing is risk-based. The whole point of testing is to remove the risk of failure. 

When people talk about ‘Risk-based testing’, what they’re really talking about is prioritised risk testing. With a proper test tool, you can quickly and easily create, and execute risk-based test packs. Jira doesn’t let you do this.

Micro Focus Octane Provides A Comprehensive Test Management Solution

As I’ve already covered, Jira is not a test management tool. If you want a true Agile test tool, you need Micro Focus ALM Octane.

Not only does Octane integrate seamlessly with Jira, but it also provides a wealth of test management functionality:

  • Requirement Management
  • Release Management
  • Custom Workflows
  • Custom and User Defined Fields
  • Support for Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)
  • IDE integration with IntelliJ, Eclipse and Visual Studio
  • CI/CD Pipeline topology visualisation
  • Build and Test Failure Analysis
  • Agile SCM linked to your backlogs
  • Pipeline Code Coverage Tracking
  • Advanced Reporting and Analytics
  • OData Support – Advanced Reporting
  • Audit Trails

Octane is a Cost-Effective Test Management Solution

ALM Octane licensing can be tailored to suit your needs – and your price point.

There is a range of different options to choose from, including:

  • Concurrent or Seat licenses
  • On-premises or SaaS 
  • Enterprise or Pro versions 

Jira is Not A Test Management Tool

I know Jira can be tempting, but it is not the right tool for the job. If you’re running Agile projects, Micro Focus ALM Octane is the only test management tool 

Get in touch today to arrange a demo of ALM Octane – See what a real test tool can do

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

28th September 2021
AI for Test Data

How to Implement AI for Test Data: 10 Considerations

Test data has always been one of the slowest, least glamorous parts of software testing. It is rarely strategic work, but it holds everything up. No matter how good your test plan is, weak data can make the whole exercise unreliable.

Choosing Performance

How to Choose a Performance Testing Tool

If you’re looking for a new performance tool or new to performance testing, it can be a tough subject to get your head around. I’ve been involved in the industry for 3 decades, and during that time, it has evolved massively. Increasingly, I talk to people at companies who’ve never

DevWeb is better than JMeter

5 Ways DevWeb Is Better Than JMeter

JMeter often becomes the default because it looks free. There is no license fee, and it appears flexible enough to do almost anything. But JMeter’s ease is often a myth. In reality, it is rarely the most sensible or low-cost choice.

Testing is Vital

Seriously Though, Five Reasons Testing is Vital

In the last main Testing Times edition (April fools day), I argued, quite ludicrously, that testing is a waste of time. That it slows releases, costs money, and ruins everyone’s fun. Judging by the comments, a few readers took it a bit too literally. So let’s be serious for a minute.

Aviator Testing AI

DevOps Aviator: AI Made For Testers

DevOps Aviator brings generative AI into software delivery to help test teams move sooner, reduce manual effort, and get answers faster. It is part of the broader Aviator suite: a set of AI capabilities embedded across OpenText products.

Testing is a waste of time

5 Reasons Testing is a Waste of Time

Let’s be honest, testing is what teams do when they don’t trust their developers. It’s a tax on speed, a relic from waterfall days, and a crutch for people afraid to ship. It just slows down releases, kills creativity, and wastes budget that could be better spent on another sprint.

OpenText Summit 2026

OpenText Summit: Why This Free Event Is Worth Your Time

You walk into a room where people are talking about the exact problems you wrestle with: tricky deployments, clunky processes, and how to test faster. Sometimes, the right conversation with the right person is enough to unlock a solution or a possibility you hadn’t even considered.

Python

Functional Testing 26.1: Adds Python, Cloud Testing, and more AI

With 26.1, OpenText is giving you something concrete: Python‑based automation, AI‑assisted verification, and cloud labs that fit into your existing CI/CD. This turns functional testing from a separate QA activity into a shared capability that developers, SDETs, and testers can all contribute to.

LoadRunner AI

LoadRunner 26.1: A New Direction in Performance Testing?

OpenText’s version 26.1 is a clear statement of where the Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) family is heading: AI-assisted, simplifying complex tasks and enabling your team to be more productive. This creates a very practical question: how do you buy and deploy these new capabilities in a way that actually moves the needle on risk, cost, and delivery speed?

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.