Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | How to
8 April, 2025

How to Generate Defect Reports from Videos!

video to defect

Testers can now convert video recordings into detailed defect reports. This groundbreaking functionality accelerates project timelines with AI-powered speed and accuracy.

Not only does this technology provide the holy trinity of speed, quality and cost savings, but it also solves a huge—often unspoken—issue on many projects: the breakdown of dev/test relations at the worst possible time.

Defect Reports: Critical, Contentious and Often Time Consuming

Defect reports (or defect tickets, bug reports, etc.) are vital to software projects. They provide developers with the information needed to identify and fix issues detected during testing.

However, defect reports (and their contents) can be a major source of contention, especially as projects near their go-live dates.

Yes, most projects stipulate what needs to be included in a defect report, but human nature dictates that each tester will have a unique approach to populating them. Equally, each developer will have different needs and expectations.

Not only that, but even the most thorough testers often face significant time challenges and must make judgment calls on what to prioritise.

If testers spend too much time writing up defects, they will often have to work evenings or weekends to get back on track. Conversely, if testers don’t spend enough time documenting defects, developers will struggle to pinpoint issues, let alone resolve them promptly.

What is Video-to-Defect?

Enter video-to-defect! This remarkable feature solves these problems by providing developers with consistent, thorough step-by-step defect information while freeing up tester time to complete their test execution backlog.

Instead of rushed defect reports with vague descriptions or incomplete steps, testers provide developers with precise, AI-generated instructions on reproducing the issue. This clarity reduces miscommunication, accelerates the entire project, and lowers the likelihood of conflicts at your go-live party.

By automating this frequently onerous process, the test team can capture even the most subtle issues in detailed reports, which developers can use to investigate issues and take appropriate action efficiently.

Why You Need Video-to-Defect

Similar to the video-to-test feature mentioned last week, the video-to-defect feature can be a game-changer for project delivery. It solves so many problems faced by software development teams:

  • Rapid Defect Identification: Hours of video footage are analysed in minutes, providing actionable insights without delaying testing cycles.
  • Enhanced Accuracy: By automating defect detection, this feature captures subtle issues that may be missed during manual testing.
  • Improved Collaboration: Clear and precise defect reproduction steps reduce friction between testers and developers. Developers no longer need to decipher vague bug reports, while testers feel their efforts are accurately represented.
  • Increased Test Coverage: Testers can focus on test execution.
  • Cost Efficiency: Early identification of defects prevents costly delays and rework during later stages of development.

Accelerate Your Project and Reduce Conflict

By automating defect detection through video analysis, video-to-defect delivers clear, actionable insights that accelerate issue resolution while maintaining high test throughput.

It bridges the communication gap between developers and testers, turning potentially contentious relationships into productive partnerships, dare we say, even friendships?

As with video-to-test, you can access video-to-defect as part of OpenText DevOps Aviator.

As software development evolves, Aviator is setting new benchmarks for innovation, efficiency, and collaboration in DevOps workflows.

With additional features like test ideation and generation, AI-generated test automation, and time-to-market predictions, you can reduce application development time by up to 60% faster while fostering stronger collaboration across disciplines.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

8th April 2025
Test Automation Hype

Are Test Automation Claims Just Marketing Hype?

Read the marketing collateral from test automation vendors and you’ll encounter bold promises around costs, coverage, and defect reduction. However, for many who have been through multiple automation initiatives, the reality frequently fails to live up to the pitch.

Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse

When Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse!

You’re deep into a project, go-live is rapidly approaching, but there is a mountain of testing to get through. Then, a key stakeholder chimes in, “Let’s just pull more people into testing.” It sounds logical: bigger effort, higher quality. But doubling down on resources can easily lead to chaos, confusion, and worse software quality.

Is Open Source Trustworthy

Do You Trust Open-Source Tools for Enterprise Testing?

Open-source testing tools like JMeter and Selenium have obvious appeal—no licensing fees, endless customisation, and a community to lean on. But, if you’re using open-source for mission-critical testing, you need to ask—is it really worth the risk?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch?

Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.