Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Functional Testing
13 July, 2022

What is Micro Focus Model Based Testing?

What is Model Based Testing?

Micro Focus has recently released Model Based Testing, a brand new functional test management platform.

Model Based Testing enables collaboration between testers and subject matter experts (SMEs).

Model Based Testing uses AI to increase the efficiency of your software testing. It also facilitates cross-functional collaboration and makes software testing much easier to manage.

Model Based Testing provides several useful business benefits

  • SMEs and Testers can collaborate efficiently
  • SMEs can define and create end-to-end business process tests
  • Testers can ensure all aspects of an application are tested
  • Business Analysts can access end-to-end flows and coverage

Model Based Testing is available either as:

  • Part of the Micro Focus ValueEdge suite, as an add-on to the ValueEdge Quality module (previously known as Octane).
  • A standalone SaaS product.

In this post, we dive a bit deeper into Model Based Testing to understand how it works, and why you should consider it.

First, though, let’s address the elephant in the room…

Collaboration Between Test and The Business… Haven’t we heard this before?

Throughout my 30 years in software development, collaboration between testers and SMEs has been one of the holy grails promised by tools vendors.

There have been many attempts at cross-functional collaboration, and almost as many failures.

There have been a few notable successes though. One particularly useful, and well-used tool is Micro Focus’s own Business Process Testing (BPT). BPT is a great example of an effective, cross-discipline test tool. This, of course, begs the question, why have Micro Focus created another functional testing collaboration tool?

While Perfect For Some, BPT Does Have Limitations

Now, I love BPT. I have loved it since the day it was released. I have long championed its ability to foster collaboration and increase visibility, and I’ve seen it used very successfully in many different organisations. But as smitten as I am, I will admit that it does have limitations.

While BPT is a perfect tool for some, it isn’t a standalone product.

BPT is firmly embedded within ALM QC. You need to log on to ALM QC to use it, all tests are held in ALM QC, and all tests must be created in an ALM native format; Sprinter, UFT, Manual etc.

Also, with BPT a tester must select which processes to run to achieve optimum test coverage. This can be aided by assigning risk and linking defects, but even with that help it is still a manual intensive, and therefore slow and costly, operation. This is fine if you only have a few business processes, but these days many organisations have thousands of business processes.

What Does Model Based Testing do Differently?

Well, Model Based Testing is more flexible, more powerful, and therefore more useful, than any other test collaboration tool.

Like its predecessors, Model Based Testing is based on the idea of reusable, componentised functional test chunks, known as Units. Units are then dragged and dropped to form Models (end-to-end processes) via an easy-access GUI. Typical units would be things like; login, search for an item, and pay with a credit card.

Unlike its predecessors, Model Based Testing is not tied to a test framework.

 Units are independent and reside in GitHub. Units can be made with Micro Focus UFT, but they can also be created with third-party test tools.

In another giant leap forward from previous collaboration tools, Model Based Testing leverages AI to create efficient test sets. It does this by analysing the different Paths through your system and creating test packs with optimum coverage of your Units and Models. This process reduces manual effort, accelerates testing, and eliminates human error.

The video below provides a great summary of Model Based Testing

Would Your Business Benefit From Enhanced Collaboration?

Do your testers struggle to get access to your business SMEs? If so, you know how this can play havoc with any software project. A lack of collaboration will lead to a decrease in software quality, whether through delays, incorrect test coverage or limited test scope.

Model Based Testing provides an efficient and effective way to build collaboration.

SMEs can work in their own time, creating the necessary business flows, safe in the knowledge that the test team will be able to use them. Testers can concentrate on creating robust and reusable functionality units.

If your business needs this level of collaboration, Model Based Testing can help.

Contact Calleo today to learn more about Model Based Testing.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

13th July 2022
Chatbots

Are General-Purpose Chatbots Good Enough for Software Testing?

You can manage software testing in Excel, but more often that not, it quickly becomes a pain in the behind. Recently, I’ve been wondering: does the same apply to AI Chatbots? After all, there are solid reasons why businesses invest in professional tools, rather than using general-purpose desktop solutions. Are there similar justifications for purpose-built testing AI tools?

Do Stakeholders Understand

Do Stakeholders Actually Understand the Purpose of Testing?

Most stakeholders don’t need to understand the finer points of software testing. They’ve got their own jobs to get on with. A finance director doesn’t need to know how to prepare test data, any more than a tester needs to understand how the finance director prepares the annual accounts. For the most part, this works well. Stakeholders get useful results, visibility of progress and enough information to make decisions. They don’t need a running commentary on everything that happens in a test environment. However, people can expect different things from those results.

testers v AI

Can Software Testers Save Mankind from AI?

In the race to protect us against rogue AI, our best defence might not be scientists or politicians, but the often-overlooked heroes of the tech world: software testers.

As AI systems increasingly mediate healthcare, criminal justice, and military decisions, this unlikely profession could hold the key to preventing existential catastrophe.

Real World UX

How to Test Real World Software Performance

When it comes to performance testing, whether you’re a seasoned expert or a complete novice, having the right tools at your disposal can make all the difference. Enter TruClient, a powerful solution designed to streamline the testing process for web and mobile applications. But what exactly makes TruClient such a valuable tool?

In essence, TruClient protocols allow you to test web and mobile applications quickly, easily and efficiently.

Most performance test scripting tools operate at a protocol level; however, TruClient records your actions in real-time, enabling faster scripting.

Evergreen Software Testing

How to Test Evergreen IT: A Very Short Guide

Evergreen IT sounds simple. Rather than running old systems for years, software is continuously updated. The benefits are obvious: access to new features, no more painful migration projects, better security, and less technical debt. This has knock-on effects for test teams. Evergreen IT reduces the need for large, occasional system

Testing has changed

Your Software Keeps Changing. Can Your Testing Keep Up?

Cloud applications, SaaS platforms, browsers, APIs and security services now update on schedules set largely by their suppliers.

Customers may be able to select a maintenance window or postpone an update briefly, but they usually cannot remain on the same version indefinitely.

The software industry often calls this evergreen software: solutions kept current through frequent, supplier-led updates instead of occasional, customer-controlled upgrades.

OT UFT One in 2026

Test Automation in 2026: Less Scripting, Easier Maintenance

Automation can and should help you release sooner and with more confidence. But it doesn’t always work out that way. It often creates its own delays, with scripts that only a few specialists can maintain, brittle checks that fail after routine interface changes and results that are, rightly, treated with scepticism.

The problem is, many people are still automating poorly, with dated approaches, fragmented automation solutions, and poor tool choices. Thankfully, in 2026, there’s a much easier way to automate functional testing.

ALM Octane in 2026

5 Ways to Know if Your Project is Really on Track

Is your software project on track? Do you really know? Are there hidden issues lurking in the background that will catch you out? Too often, the answers are buried in silos across different tools. By the time someone pulls everything together, some of the information is already out of date.

ALM Octane gives you instant access to up-to-date delivery information. It shows you the current state of quality, what is on track, what is holding delivery up and whether you have enough evidence to release with confidence.

Performance testing in 2026

These LoadRunner Cloud Updates Make Performance Testing Better in 2026

LoadRunner Cloud gives teams a SaaS platform for creating and running performance tests without having to build and maintain all the supporting load-generation infrastructure themselves.

Officially named OpenText Core Performance Engineering, LoadRunner Cloud can simulate anything from a small number of users to millions, across different locations, applications and technologies.

Software Testing Risk

Is Remote Software Testing Creating New Risks You Haven’t Even Considered?

Increasingly, organisations expect remote and hybrid testers to use borrowed tool licences, unstable VPNs, and software never designed to leave the office. That creates significant compliance and security risks that can turn into serious long‑term problems.

It’s not the testers per se, but remote execution over on‑prem licences is a software audit waiting to happen. Read on to learn why a compliance nightmare isn’t the only reason your test setup might not be fit for distributed and home‑working team members.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.