Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Functional Testing
13 July, 2022

What is Micro Focus Model Based Testing?

What is Model Based Testing?

Micro Focus has recently released Model Based Testing, a brand new functional test management platform.

Model Based Testing enables collaboration between testers and subject matter experts (SMEs).

Model Based Testing uses AI to increase the efficiency of your software testing. It also facilitates cross-functional collaboration and makes software testing much easier to manage.

Model Based Testing provides several useful business benefits

  • SMEs and Testers can collaborate efficiently
  • SMEs can define and create end-to-end business process tests
  • Testers can ensure all aspects of an application are tested
  • Business Analysts can access end-to-end flows and coverage

Model Based Testing is available either as:

  • Part of the Micro Focus ValueEdge suite, as an add-on to the ValueEdge Quality module (previously known as Octane).
  • A standalone SaaS product.

In this post, we dive a bit deeper into Model Based Testing to understand how it works, and why you should consider it.

First, though, let’s address the elephant in the room…

Collaboration Between Test and The Business… Haven’t we heard this before?

Throughout my 30 years in software development, collaboration between testers and SMEs has been one of the holy grails promised by tools vendors.

There have been many attempts at cross-functional collaboration, and almost as many failures.

There have been a few notable successes though. One particularly useful, and well-used tool is Micro Focus’s own Business Process Testing (BPT). BPT is a great example of an effective, cross-discipline test tool. This, of course, begs the question, why have Micro Focus created another functional testing collaboration tool?

While Perfect For Some, BPT Does Have Limitations

Now, I love BPT. I have loved it since the day it was released. I have long championed its ability to foster collaboration and increase visibility, and I’ve seen it used very successfully in many different organisations. But as smitten as I am, I will admit that it does have limitations.

While BPT is a perfect tool for some, it isn’t a standalone product.

BPT is firmly embedded within ALM QC. You need to log on to ALM QC to use it, all tests are held in ALM QC, and all tests must be created in an ALM native format; Sprinter, UFT, Manual etc.

Also, with BPT a tester must select which processes to run to achieve optimum test coverage. This can be aided by assigning risk and linking defects, but even with that help it is still a manual intensive, and therefore slow and costly, operation. This is fine if you only have a few business processes, but these days many organisations have thousands of business processes.

What Does Model Based Testing do Differently?

Well, Model Based Testing is more flexible, more powerful, and therefore more useful, than any other test collaboration tool.

Like its predecessors, Model Based Testing is based on the idea of reusable, componentised functional test chunks, known as Units. Units are then dragged and dropped to form Models (end-to-end processes) via an easy-access GUI. Typical units would be things like; login, search for an item, and pay with a credit card.

Unlike its predecessors, Model Based Testing is not tied to a test framework.

 Units are independent and reside in GitHub. Units can be made with Micro Focus UFT, but they can also be created with third-party test tools.

In another giant leap forward from previous collaboration tools, Model Based Testing leverages AI to create efficient test sets. It does this by analysing the different Paths through your system and creating test packs with optimum coverage of your Units and Models. This process reduces manual effort, accelerates testing, and eliminates human error.

The video below provides a great summary of Model Based Testing

Would Your Business Benefit From Enhanced Collaboration?

Do your testers struggle to get access to your business SMEs? If so, you know how this can play havoc with any software project. A lack of collaboration will lead to a decrease in software quality, whether through delays, incorrect test coverage or limited test scope.

Model Based Testing provides an efficient and effective way to build collaboration.

SMEs can work in their own time, creating the necessary business flows, safe in the knowledge that the test team will be able to use them. Testers can concentrate on creating robust and reusable functionality units.

If your business needs this level of collaboration, Model Based Testing can help.

Contact Calleo today to learn more about Model Based Testing.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

13th July 2022
LoadRunner AI

LoadRunner 26.1: A New Direction in Performance Testing?

OpenText’s version 26.1 is a clear statement of where the Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) family is heading: AI-assisted, simplifying complex tasks and enabling your team to be more productive. This creates a very practical question: how do you buy and deploy these new capabilities in a way that actually moves the needle on risk, cost, and delivery speed?

Hooked on Open Source

Revealed: How Consultancies Get You Hooked on Bad Tools

Picture the scene: you’re about to engage a consultancy for testing services, and their proposal leans heavily on open‑source tools, but there’s a nagging doubt… a misalignment between what you’re paying for and what they’re delivering.

You want the guidance and support to prevent costly mistakes; they want more billable days.

Calleo Sell Test Tools

Calleo: We Sell Test Tools

With Calleo, you get expert guidance to find the right options, demos and trial licenses to evaluate them, and practical help to get up and running. You’ll see the pros, cons and long-term costs clearly before making any decisions, and stay supported with renewals and updates long after you’ve started using the tool.

cut test maintenance

4 Ways to Cut Test Maintenance Effort with AI

Automation maintenance is a pain. It’s a frustrating time drain that nobody enjoys. Unfortunately, teams are doing more of it than ever, with modern solutions changing like the wind and each new release jeopardising script integrity. Thankfully, AI-driven automation is here to help.

2025 top testing articles

2025 Roundup: Check Out The Top 5 Testing Times Articles

Thanks to your support, 2025 was another excellent year for Testing Times and our 10,000+ subscribers. We explored a wide range of software testing topics, including test automation, performance testing, Jira fatigue, tester authority, and more. Below is a quick look at the five newsletters with the most reactions this year, and why they resonated so strongly.

Is WFH worth the risk

Remote Testing: Is Working From Home Worth The Risk?

Increasingly, organisations expect remote and hybrid testers to use borrowed tool licences, unstable VPNs, and software never designed to leave the office. That creates significant compliance and security risks that can turn into serious long‑term problems. It’s not the testers per se, but remote execution over on‑prem licences is a software audit waiting to happen. Read on to learn why a compliance nightmare isn’t the only reason your test setup might not be fit for distributed and home‑working team members.

Effortless automation

Solved: 4 Common Test Automation Headaches

Software teams know the story all too well: automation promises speed and reliability, but reality often brings fragile scripts, phantom failures, and endless rework. In the end, the technology intended to accelerate releases ends up bogging things down. Or at least, that’s how things used to be… Today’s AI-powered functional

Test the Untestable

Test the Untestable: Unlock Savings & Accelerate Your Project

Testers have long been asked to test earlier, faster, and more often. In truth, however, when critical APIs, integrations, or microservices aren’t ready, testing gets stuck. We’ve all been there, raring to go, like greyhounds in the slips…  but with nothing to test, and increasingly concerned about the impending last-minute panic.

The Test Tools You Need

Testers: Will We Finally Get The Tools We Need?

During the 2008 credit crunch, companies slashed technical investment. The mantra “do more with less” stuck—and 17 years later, testers are still paying the price as demands, complexity, and expectations have soared. It’s no coincidence that we’re witnessing an increasing number of high-profile software failures and cyber attacks. Yet, there’s still little willingness to invest in the right test tools and training.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.