Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Functional Testing
13 July, 2022

What is Micro Focus Model Based Testing?

What is Model Based Testing?

Micro Focus has recently released Model Based Testing, a brand new functional test management platform.

Model Based Testing enables collaboration between testers and subject matter experts (SMEs).

Model Based Testing uses AI to increase the efficiency of your software testing. It also facilitates cross-functional collaboration and makes software testing much easier to manage.

Model Based Testing provides several useful business benefits

  • SMEs and Testers can collaborate efficiently
  • SMEs can define and create end-to-end business process tests
  • Testers can ensure all aspects of an application are tested
  • Business Analysts can access end-to-end flows and coverage

Model Based Testing is available either as:

  • Part of the Micro Focus ValueEdge suite, as an add-on to the ValueEdge Quality module (previously known as Octane).
  • A standalone SaaS product.

In this post, we dive a bit deeper into Model Based Testing to understand how it works, and why you should consider it.

First, though, let’s address the elephant in the room…

Collaboration Between Test and The Business… Haven’t we heard this before?

Throughout my 30 years in software development, collaboration between testers and SMEs has been one of the holy grails promised by tools vendors.

There have been many attempts at cross-functional collaboration, and almost as many failures.

There have been a few notable successes though. One particularly useful, and well-used tool is Micro Focus’s own Business Process Testing (BPT). BPT is a great example of an effective, cross-discipline test tool. This, of course, begs the question, why have Micro Focus created another functional testing collaboration tool?

While Perfect For Some, BPT Does Have Limitations

Now, I love BPT. I have loved it since the day it was released. I have long championed its ability to foster collaboration and increase visibility, and I’ve seen it used very successfully in many different organisations. But as smitten as I am, I will admit that it does have limitations.

While BPT is a perfect tool for some, it isn’t a standalone product.

BPT is firmly embedded within ALM QC. You need to log on to ALM QC to use it, all tests are held in ALM QC, and all tests must be created in an ALM native format; Sprinter, UFT, Manual etc.

Also, with BPT a tester must select which processes to run to achieve optimum test coverage. This can be aided by assigning risk and linking defects, but even with that help it is still a manual intensive, and therefore slow and costly, operation. This is fine if you only have a few business processes, but these days many organisations have thousands of business processes.

What Does Model Based Testing do Differently?

Well, Model Based Testing is more flexible, more powerful, and therefore more useful, than any other test collaboration tool.

Like its predecessors, Model Based Testing is based on the idea of reusable, componentised functional test chunks, known as Units. Units are then dragged and dropped to form Models (end-to-end processes) via an easy-access GUI. Typical units would be things like; login, search for an item, and pay with a credit card.

Unlike its predecessors, Model Based Testing is not tied to a test framework.

 Units are independent and reside in GitHub. Units can be made with Micro Focus UFT, but they can also be created with third-party test tools.

In another giant leap forward from previous collaboration tools, Model Based Testing leverages AI to create efficient test sets. It does this by analysing the different Paths through your system and creating test packs with optimum coverage of your Units and Models. This process reduces manual effort, accelerates testing, and eliminates human error.

The video below provides a great summary of Model Based Testing

Would Your Business Benefit From Enhanced Collaboration?

Do your testers struggle to get access to your business SMEs? If so, you know how this can play havoc with any software project. A lack of collaboration will lead to a decrease in software quality, whether through delays, incorrect test coverage or limited test scope.

Model Based Testing provides an efficient and effective way to build collaboration.

SMEs can work in their own time, creating the necessary business flows, safe in the knowledge that the test team will be able to use them. Testers can concentrate on creating robust and reusable functionality units.

If your business needs this level of collaboration, Model Based Testing can help.

Contact Calleo today to learn more about Model Based Testing.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

13th July 2022
Test Automation Hype

Are Test Automation Claims Just Marketing Hype?

Read the marketing collateral from test automation vendors and you’ll encounter bold promises around costs, coverage, and defect reduction. However, for many who have been through multiple automation initiatives, the reality frequently fails to live up to the pitch.

Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse

When Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse!

You’re deep into a project, go-live is rapidly approaching, but there is a mountain of testing to get through. Then, a key stakeholder chimes in, “Let’s just pull more people into testing.” It sounds logical: bigger effort, higher quality. But doubling down on resources can easily lead to chaos, confusion, and worse software quality.

Is Open Source Trustworthy

Do You Trust Open-Source Tools for Enterprise Testing?

Open-source testing tools like JMeter and Selenium have obvious appeal—no licensing fees, endless customisation, and a community to lean on. But, if you’re using open-source for mission-critical testing, you need to ask—is it really worth the risk?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch?

Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.