Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Mobile Testing
6 January, 2021

Solved: 54% of Mobile Testers found THIS their biggest challenge

In the latest Calleo poll, 54% of respondents said that sourcing mobile devices is the biggest challenge when mobile testing.

Luckily, we know a great solution…

The Mobile Device Challenge

At Calleo, we’re very familiar with this challenge. Simply put, your solution must work on many different devices. Be it phones, tablets or hybrids, from various makers with myriad operating systems and configurations. 

The challenge is not only the amount of devices, you also need easy access – particularly challenging when your whole test team is working from home.

Then of course, you need to bring some realism to your devices. How do you spoof real-world locations or simulate network conditions?

When you’ve got all your devices, how do you keep them up-to-date? Not just with their own software, but with yours? How many times will you have to install new versions of your app-under-test?

Like I said, we didn’t find this answer at all surprising. Sourcing Mobile Devices is a tough challenge if you don’t the answer, but it’s really easy when you know how… 

Solved: The Mobile Device Challenge

UFT Mobile is your answer.

For the uninitiated, UFT Mobile (previously ‘Mobile Center’) is Micro Focus’s industry leading Mobile Testing Tool. UFT Mobile covers functional, automation, security and performance testing and is a complete game-changer for Mobile Testers.

UFT Mobile – 4 Solutions to the Mobile Device Challenge

1 – Mobile Device Farm: UFT Mobile allows you to pool your physical devices to create your own farm, which all the team can connect to. You can even hook the devices up to your own laptop so others in your team can connect to them. 

2 – Mobile Device Lab: With UFT Mobile you can access devices via the cloud or using emulators. These devices supplement your own mobile kit, and you don’t ever have to own them.

3 – Network Virtualization: UFT Mobile come with Micro Focus Network Virtualization. This lets you simulate real-world conditions for your devices, including bandwidth, latency, jitter, and packet loss. Think about someone on a train traveling from London to Newcastle.

4 – Remote Install & Reboot: UFT Mobile will flash install your app to all the devices in your Mobile Farm… and reboot them. In fact, you UFT Mobile gives you complete control over all of your devices.

Eliminate Your Mobile Testing Challenges

Sourcing Mobile Devices can be tricky. Whether it’s getting hold of the devices, letting your team access them, or making them perform realistically, there’s a lot to think about. But it doesn’t need to be hard. 

UFT Mobile solves your mobile device challenges. Maximise your current devices and augment them with cloud sourced devices and emulation, even simulate real world conditions to make your testing as effective as possible.

Click Here to Eliminate Your Mobile Testing Challenges

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

6th January 2021
Test Automation Hype

Are Test Automation Claims Just Marketing Hype?

Read the marketing collateral from test automation vendors and you’ll encounter bold promises around costs, coverage, and defect reduction. However, for many who have been through multiple automation initiatives, the reality frequently fails to live up to the pitch.

Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse

When Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse!

You’re deep into a project, go-live is rapidly approaching, but there is a mountain of testing to get through. Then, a key stakeholder chimes in, “Let’s just pull more people into testing.” It sounds logical: bigger effort, higher quality. But doubling down on resources can easily lead to chaos, confusion, and worse software quality.

Is Open Source Trustworthy

Do You Trust Open-Source Tools for Enterprise Testing?

Open-source testing tools like JMeter and Selenium have obvious appeal—no licensing fees, endless customisation, and a community to lean on. But, if you’re using open-source for mission-critical testing, you need to ask—is it really worth the risk?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch?

Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.