Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | From a different perspective
16 December, 2024

Carry On Testing: A Couple of Funny QA Mishaps

System 38

Ah, software testing—where meticulous planning meets unexpected chaos and where even the most rigorous quality assurance can sometimes go awkwardly awry. As we bid farewell to 2024, it’s time to take a step back and indulge in some light-hearted reflection on the quirky side of our profession.

We’ve all been there: that moment when seemingly well-tested code does the unexpected.

Whether it’s a seemingly coincidental system crash or a code miscalculation that clears out a bank account, testing mishaps remind us that Murphy’s Law is often lurking around the corner…

The Game Where Winning Means Losing (Your System)

Back in the 1980s, I was learning to code and was attending IBM training courses. Of course, this was well before the common use of PCs with graphical capability, but despite that, there were still text-based games available on the System 38 we were using.

That being the case, during course downtime, we were allowed to play dice games, an adventure game and—my personal favourite—a racing game!  Even better, I was allowed to copy the games and load them up on my company system.

The racing game was easily my most played, and I was hooked! Playing during breaks, I would choose the track and navigate around using the right amount of acceleration, braking and steering.

I stuck at the game for weeks, trying to get a perfect lap. The tolerances were ridiculous, and I just kept crashing out—games from the 70s and 80s were generally way tougher than current ones.

Then, one day, finally, I made it! I didn’t crash once, completed a perfect lap and finished the race.

Obviously buzzing, I wanted to show off to my colleagues when, all of a sudden, the computer shut down. As I said earlier, this was the pre-PC era, and we were running the business on a minicomputer, with 100+ people using that single machine.

It was an inconvenience, but these things would happen occasionally, so we rebooted and continued working.

Fast forward a few weeks later, and I was playing again. I was getting closer to another perfect lap… and then I managed it, and shock, horror, the system shut down again!

This time, we suspected the game was the cause—a bit of a harsh reward for winning the game.

Anyway, the next time I went back to IBM, I found out that their system engineers wrote the games in the early days of the computer, partially in machine code and referencing something that the system didn’t know how to handle.

Needless to say, my company quickly implemented new policies on what we could and couldn’t use the work computer for!

Maybe They Didn’t See the Point of Testing?

In another classic case of “oops, didn’t see that coming,” my company set out to implement a system for making payments to customers via BACS (Bankers’ Automated Clearing Services). These days we all have faster payments.

The programmer diligently wrote the code, tested it, and gave it the green light. What could go wrong?

Well, the first time it ran, the Finance Director got a call from the bank manager concerned that the account was massively overdrawn!

Now that I think about it, this was around the time of Superman III, with a plot to siphon off fractions of a penny, but this was more cockup than conspiracy. 

So, what could have happened?

It turns out that the developer had forgotten to allow for two decimal points, and the tape was instructing the bank to pay out 100x, the amount it should have been paying!

We never did find out what happened with the money, but I will hazard a guess that they didn’t get all the money back.

Share Your Testing Tales!

Now it’s your turn! What’s the funniest or most cringe-worthy testing story you’ve encountered in your career?

The best way to avoid future blunders is to learn from past mistakes—preferably with a good sense of humour—so share your tales in the LinkedIn comments!

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

16th December 2024
Test Automation Hype

Are Test Automation Claims Just Marketing Hype?

Read the marketing collateral from test automation vendors and you’ll encounter bold promises around costs, coverage, and defect reduction. However, for many who have been through multiple automation initiatives, the reality frequently fails to live up to the pitch.

Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse

When Adding More Testers Makes Quality Worse!

You’re deep into a project, go-live is rapidly approaching, but there is a mountain of testing to get through. Then, a key stakeholder chimes in, “Let’s just pull more people into testing.” It sounds logical: bigger effort, higher quality. But doubling down on resources can easily lead to chaos, confusion, and worse software quality.

Is Open Source Trustworthy

Do You Trust Open-Source Tools for Enterprise Testing?

Open-source testing tools like JMeter and Selenium have obvious appeal—no licensing fees, endless customisation, and a community to lean on. But, if you’re using open-source for mission-critical testing, you need to ask—is it really worth the risk?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch?

Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Insights

Search

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.