I often speak to people who want to abandon legacy test tools and transition to shiny new solutions. They cite several reasons for the switch, many of which are valid, while others need greater consideration to avoid a negative or costly outcome. On the other hand, I also speak to people who are reluctant to ever change tools, even though they’d see incredible benefits.
Sometimes, you need to change tools, but not always. There are often excellent reasons to stay with the tools you already have. The key is understanding what you have, what you need, the options available, and the cost and effort involved in sticking or twisting.
In this week’s insight, I explore why switching tools can make complete sense in many situations, yet why there are other times when staying with the solutions you already have is a better decision.
STOP! Before You Leap…
After years with the same tools, it’s easy to assume that something newer automatically means something better.
When tools have become truly obsolete, unsupported, or unable to scale with your ambitions, it is time to move on. However, sometimes the term legacy is just a euphemism for proven.
Often, the most overlooked step is an honest assessment of what you have today and what you need for the future, including what is truly essential and what is just desirable. I inwardly cheer when I see a requirements document, where a company has thought through the features, SLA’s, support, security, etc.
So, before reacting to the pressure of slick demos or anecdotes touting game-changing features, it’s worth pausing to check: What does your current tool really do for you, and what’s truly missing?
Frequently, I speak to companies that pay annual support, but haven’t updated their tools in ages. The record is 8+ years. Then, they see another solution with amazing new features that could revolutionise their testing processes.
What they don’t realise is that all they need to do is upgrade what they already have, and they would have access to those same features, without incurring the costs of new software, migration projects, or staff retraining fees.
What’s Driving Change?
The reasons to upgrade—or abandon—legacy test tools usually fall into one of a handful of categories:
- Lack of support or ongoing development: When a tool is no longer updated or has been abandoned by its vendor, you risk running critical operations on unpatched, insecure, or increasingly incompatible software. If support is poor or costs for continued licensing are ballooning, a change becomes obvious.
- Serious productivity or integration gaps: If the tools in use are slowing down releases, depend heavily on manual effort, or cannot keep up with DevOps practices and automation, this is another sign you need a refresh.
- The reality of distributed teams: Many older tools were designed for on-premises work. With hybrid and remote-first models now the norm, it’s essential to use test tools that offer robust cloud support, remote management, and are secure by default.
- Canned demos at a conference. We’ve all seen that fantastic new product that can do everything you’ve ever wanted from a test tool, and had a great follow-up call with the company’s rep. Is this a valid reason to contemplate change, you tell me?
The Coverage Challenge: One Tool for the Stack
A decade ago, having a test tool for each application (UI, SAP, API, mobile, etc.) was the norm.
Today’s reality is different. Leading-edge test suites—such as those from OpenText—are designed to handle multiple types of applications and platforms from a single interface, dramatically reducing licensing sprawl, support headaches and cost.
Migrating to one of these universal or all-in-one solutions can simplify test management, reporting, and compliance, while also making life easier for teams spread across regions.
Easy Paths to Migration
Suppose you’re on venerable platforms like ALM QC or LoadRunner Professional and moving to Agile/DevOps delivery, or hybrid/remote teams.
In that case, there’s usually an upgrade path to more modern tools such as OpenText Software Delivery Management (formerly Octane) or OpenText Core Performance Engineering (Formerly LoadRunner Cloud).
These platforms are built for Agile and DevOps, can run alongside your existing test tools during transition, and unlock the kind of parallel testing, detailed analytics, and flexible licensing that today’s hybrid teams demand.
Importantly, these moves don’t need to be disruptive—side-by-side adoption is possible, allowing a gradual and safe transition.
How Much Will Switching Tools Cost, Really?
The bottom-line decision should never be based solely on the sticker price of a license.
Consider the cost of disruption. Sticking with an obsolete tool can lead to compounding technical debt, a slower time to market, and increased support overhead. But a rushed jump to something new brings its own dangers: migration pain, retraining investment, and the risk of simply swapping one set of problems for another.
I’ve spoken about the hidden costs associated with open-source test tools numerous times.
They often end up costing significantly more than their professional, paid alternatives, whilst delivering less. Couple that with rebuilding all your existing assets (tests, sets, plans, etc) and you could end up incurring serious time and money.
One thing to consider here is that many professional tools, such as the OpenText suite, enable the integration of existing assets from platforms like Selenium or JMeter, making the transition significantly more cost-effective. Additionally, it is possible to easily import data from various test management tools into OpenText’s test management tools.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the most effective approach is methodical.
Take inventory of features, assess pain points, and weigh what the market genuinely offers. Decide based on facts, not fear of missing out or pure inertia.
Sometimes, the best tools are the ones you already have—if you exploit their full potential and keep them up to date.
However, when new business needs, a lack of support, or the evolution of your team demands more, the right universal or remote-ready tool can be transformative.
Do you have questions, or would you like to understand the latest test tool landscape? Get in touch—it’s worth exploring other options before making your next big move.
