Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | From a different perspective | How to
27 November, 2018

3 options for your legacy testing tools

Whether it’s your mobile phone, laptop, Fitbit or games console, it’s unlikely you are still using the same model you bought even four or five years ago.   Most people replace their tech regularly – out with the old, in with the new.

At work, you may have “legacy” testing software that hasn’t been replaced for a few years. 

So is this a case, too, of out with the old, in with the new? Should you replace your testing software regularly, as soon as it doesn’t do what you need any more?
 
Not so fast.
 
You have a few other choices, which might be easier, cheaper and even better.

1. Upgrade.  As I mentioned in my blog from last week, there’s a good chance that since you bought your testing software, there have been several upgrades released. If you implemented them, your “old” testing software might be completely up-to-date, on par with any new system.
 
Upgrading will not only be much cheaper, but it will also allow you to preserve your testing assets (itself a major saving of both time and money).
It is also a saving to be able to use a more recent version of a tool you have been using for years, instead of having to learn a new one.
 
You may worry that upgrading your software is complicated, but that is not necessarily the case. If you have a Micro Focus product, we can make it simple for you – just drop me a line to see how we can help you upgrade.

2. Return to support…. And then upgrade. It is harder to upgrade if you are out of support, and therefore unable to access the latest versions of your testing software.

But this does not have to be an insurmountable obstacle.  It used to be the case that if you wanted to return to support, you had to backdate your payments – making this an expensive proposition.

This is not necessarily the case anymore. Returning to support might be much simpler than you think.

And even if it’s not, there may be an upgrade path you haven’t thought of. Again that is something we can help you with just drop me a line to find out more.

Drop me a line

3. Replace your tool. In most cases, it is only when you have explored both these options and come up empty-handed that it makes sense to look at totally new software, which will likely cost you more and take time to learn.

Simply replacing what you have with a newer, shinier tool is not always the right approach. 

You need to look at the assets you already have, and figure out how to use them going forward. They might be an enormous asset and replacing them could be an unwelcome and costly expense.

Not sure which path to follow? Need help bringing your legacy tools up to date?

We will audit your legacy Micro Focus software for free, then figure out the best path to get you back to a current version.  Or, if that is not possible, help you find the best replacement tool.

But don’t wait – this free audit is only available to the first 5 companies to apply. 

Request an audit

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

27th November 2018
AI for Test Data

How to Implement AI for Test Data: 10 Considerations

Test data has always been one of the slowest, least glamorous parts of software testing. It is rarely strategic work, but it holds everything up. No matter how good your test plan is, weak data can make the whole exercise unreliable.

Choosing Performance

How to Choose a Performance Testing Tool

If you’re looking for a new performance tool or new to performance testing, it can be a tough subject to get your head around. I’ve been involved in the industry for 3 decades, and during that time, it has evolved massively. Increasingly, I talk to people at companies who’ve never

DevWeb is better than JMeter

5 Ways DevWeb Is Better Than JMeter

JMeter often becomes the default because it looks free. There is no license fee, and it appears flexible enough to do almost anything. But JMeter’s ease is often a myth. In reality, it is rarely the most sensible or low-cost choice.

Testing is Vital

Seriously Though, Five Reasons Testing is Vital

In the last main Testing Times edition (April fools day), I argued, quite ludicrously, that testing is a waste of time. That it slows releases, costs money, and ruins everyone’s fun. Judging by the comments, a few readers took it a bit too literally. So let’s be serious for a minute.

Aviator Testing AI

DevOps Aviator: AI Made For Testers

DevOps Aviator brings generative AI into software delivery to help test teams move sooner, reduce manual effort, and get answers faster. It is part of the broader Aviator suite: a set of AI capabilities embedded across OpenText products.

Testing is a waste of time

5 Reasons Testing is a Waste of Time

Let’s be honest, testing is what teams do when they don’t trust their developers. It’s a tax on speed, a relic from waterfall days, and a crutch for people afraid to ship. It just slows down releases, kills creativity, and wastes budget that could be better spent on another sprint.

OpenText Summit 2026

OpenText Summit: Why This Free Event Is Worth Your Time

You walk into a room where people are talking about the exact problems you wrestle with: tricky deployments, clunky processes, and how to test faster. Sometimes, the right conversation with the right person is enough to unlock a solution or a possibility you hadn’t even considered.

Python

Functional Testing 26.1: Adds Python, Cloud Testing, and more AI

With 26.1, OpenText is giving you something concrete: Python‑based automation, AI‑assisted verification, and cloud labs that fit into your existing CI/CD. This turns functional testing from a separate QA activity into a shared capability that developers, SDETs, and testers can all contribute to.

LoadRunner AI

LoadRunner 26.1: A New Direction in Performance Testing?

OpenText’s version 26.1 is a clear statement of where the Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) family is heading: AI-assisted, simplifying complex tasks and enabling your team to be more productive. This creates a very practical question: how do you buy and deploy these new capabilities in a way that actually moves the needle on risk, cost, and delivery speed?

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.