Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | From a different perspective
9 July, 2025

Should Testers Be Allowed to Block Releases?

Should testers be allowed to block releases?

Your testers find a critical bug the night before a major release. Should they have the power to stop the launch? Testers provide essential insights into software quality and risk. Their analysis is critical for decision-makers, so would it make sense to give them the power to veto releases?

In this insight, I explore:

  • What does it mean to ‘block a release’
  • Why tester analysis is vital
  • Whether testers should be able to block releases
  • How to ensure everyone has their finger on the pulse

What Does ‘Blocking a Release’ Really Mean?

To ‘block a release’ means to halt the deployment of software. This could be due to several factors, including those relevant to our discussion, such as quality or risk concerns.

Testers, with their deep technical knowledge and rigorous analysis, are often the first to spot issues that could impact users or business operations.

Their findings serve as key inputs for decision-makers—product owners, business stakeholders, and leadership—who must weigh technical risk against business needs.

A Real-World Horror Story – With a Twist

Years ago, I worked on an exciting new application that was rapidly approaching its go-live date.

Unfortunately, the system had significant performance issues, and many of us believed releasing it would be a disaster. Even more unfortunately, the business went ahead anyway.

The result? Months of strain, long hours, and a deluge of high-priority support tickets. Everyone on the project could see the glaringly obvious—Going live was clearly the wrong decision. If only the business had listened to the test team, they would have spared everyone months of grief and headaches.

Turns out, though, things were a little bit more complicated than they first appeared. A decade later, I learned the truth—Failure to go-live would have threatened the company’s survival.

The business stakeholders had to make a tough call; one that only they were equipped to make.

Testers Shouldn’t Have the Final Say

While testers are essential, the decision to release is fundamentally a business one.

It’s about balancing technical risk with commercial realities, timelines, and commitments. Even the most senior Head of Quality & Testing, skilled though they may be, doesn’t have the complete picture.

Tester Input Must Be Taken Seriously

That said, testers are the eyes and ears of the project and business stakeholders.

They provide unbiased, data-driven assessments of software readiness. When their input is valued and acted upon promptly, teams can address risks proactively, rather than reactively.

Test results are a source of unbiased and unfiltered truth. By focusing on testing insights and understanding key risks early, teams can prevent nasty eleventh-hour surprises.

How To Give Testing a Stronger Voice

Testers’ voices are strongest when backed by precise, accessible data, including metrics and dashboards that communicate risk in a language everyone understands.

Rather than only sharing test data at the end of phases, there needs to be complete transparency of test results and progress throughout the quality process. This ensures that issues are visible and can be addressed before go/no-go meetings.

By providing constant feedback loops, testers can help ensure that high-risk problems are addressed early, rather than left to fester until the last minute.

Decision Making is Easier With Test Management Tools

Modern test management tools, such as OpenText™ Software Delivery Management (formerly ValueEdge Quality/ALM Octane), are game changers.

These tools enable better decision-making by:

  • Providing a single view of the truth
  • Streamlining evidence capture
  • Tracking and highlighting progress
  • Making transparency the default setting

And most importantly, test management tools are always up to date; there’s no need to wait for a report to be produced. Everyone involved in the project and all stakeholders can always access a clear picture of the solution’s readiness.

Quality concerns are visible, documented, and thoroughly discussed well before release deadlines. Paving the way to an informed go/no-go decision. 

Testers Shouldn’t Block Releases, But Should Enable Earlier and Better Decisions

Testers shouldn’t have the final say on releases, but their input is invaluable.

To keep your team on top of release readiness, invest in a robust test management solution such as OpenText™ Software Delivery Management.

It’s the best way to ensure your next release is not just a leap of faith, but a confident step forward and enables:

  • Visibility and transparency
  • Clear, defensible evidence
  • Easy evidence capture and structured data

Ready To Make Better Release Decisions?
Explore OpenText™ Software Delivery Management and put your team in control of quality, risk, and readiness—every step of the way.

Related Products

ALM Octane
Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

9th July 2025
Bug seeding

Bebugging: Would You Plant Defects to Test Testers?

Would you intentionally plant defects to test your test team? Bebugging, as it’s known, is a technique where software flaws are purposely introduced to gauge testing effectiveness. Are there times and places where bebugging is a valid way to help improve processes, tighten up testing, or root out a potential weak link?

Unethical Test Tool Marketing

Exposed: Are You Being Conned By Test Tool Marketing?

We have all witnessed an alarming rise in deceptive marketing practices that undermine customer decision-making and market integrity, with tool vendors increasingly comparing their tools to industry leaders using deliberately misleading information.

Flaky Automated Tests

Are Flaky Automated Tests Better Than None at All?

Is flaky automation better than no automation at all? Does it help accelerate projects and reduce timelines, or does it end up causing more problems than it solves? And are the questions moot when, with modern AI-powered tools, there’s no excuse for flaky tests?

Software Testing Concepts

Software QA Mythbusting: 5 Misunderstood Testing Concepts

We’ve all been there—sitting in a meeting, nodding along, confident that everyone shares the same understanding, only to discover later that our ideas were built on shaky ground, based on false assumptions and an incomplete grasp of a complex situation. In the world of software development, nowhere is this more common, or more consequential, than with software testing.

LoadRunner v JMeter

LoadRunner: Cheaper & Easier Than JMeter?

Four years ago, I wrote about how LoadRunner Cloud was debunking the myth that open-source is cheaper. At the time, LoadRunner Cloud’s pay-as-you-go pricing, bundled infrastructure, and rapid setup were already making it a compelling alternative to JMeter and similar tools.

Model Based Testing

How to Bridge the Gap Between Business and Testing

MBT can transform software QA processes through enhanced collaboration between testers and subject matter experts (SMEs). It offers enhanced capabilities for businesses seeking efficient, comprehensive testing solutions in an increasingly complex software landscape.

Time to Ditch Jira

Is it Time to Ditch Jira? (… For Test Management)

Are you sick of Jira test management solutions? You’re not alone. I speak to dozens of businesses monthly across all different sectors. Many have been forced to use Jira for test management. The more positive people I talk to say it is okay at best.

How to Succeed at Software Testing

6 Proven Principles For Software Testing Success

After decades in the software industry, I’ve witnessed firsthand how six fundamental principles consistently drive software testing success regardless of methodology or domain. Whether you work in functional or performance testing, follow Waterfall or Agile, or specialise in manual or automated testing, these guidelines form a checklist for consistent testing success.

Performance Test Tool Innovations

What’s New: 5 Important Performance Test Tool Innovations

OpenText’s performance test tools—formerly the LoadRunner family—are continuously improving. Over the last few years, they’ve been enhanced with new features to help your teams deliver responsive, resilient applications with an excellent user experience.

Test Automation Framework Secret

Test Automation: Do Custom Frameworks Hide a Dirty Secret?

It’s 2025, yet many organisations still develop bespoke test automation harnesses and frameworks, stitching together a modular in-house automation solution.  This is due to various invalid assumptions and short-sighted commercial decisions.

Insights

Search

Related Products

ALM Octane

Related Articles

InsightsTrending

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.