Products

Problems
we solve

We can help your business

Request a Free Demo / trial

Insights

Insights | Application Monitoring | How to
3 September, 2018

How to avoid one star for your mobile app

Black Mirror is a hit TV show that explores the unexpected consequences of new technologies.

In a well-known episode called Nosedive, people were able to rate each other on social media. The main character scored 4.2-stars out of 5, where strong social media approval bestowed status and benefits.

Through a series of mishaps, her ratings dipped to less than 1-star. Gradually, her social status nosedived as well, with friends and acquaintances shunning her.

If you think this is nothing like real life, think again….

It sounds radical, but it isn’t too distant from the world we already live in.

If your company launches an app or website which attracts bad ratings, it can be hard to gain any traction.

No matter how many hours you and your team have invested in the app, a few bad reviews put off future users. Peer reviews are enormously influential online, and if potential customers see a slew of one- or two-star ratings, they are unlikely to try it out for themselves.

Your popularity nosedives, and there’s very little you can do to reverse course.

Not only is there an enormous financial impact, this can also do serious reputational damage to your company. And if you are part of the digital team, management will not thank you.

The problem is that all too often, companies invest heavily in design, development, user interface, testing and infrastructure, but still don’t see what their customers see.

Somehow, the true user experience has escaped them (particularly true for mobile).

In order to succeed, you need a clear understanding of how your app will perform across different devices and operating systems.

So what can you do about this?

The solution is a family of products called AppPulse.

Launched two years ago, AppPulse is now a mature and feature-rich product that enables you to see what your customers will see, before they do.

It helps you ensure your app launch will be successful – earning four and five stars, not one! – and monitors it in the future to make certain that you continue to get the app ratings you need, even when your app is updated.

AppPulse is a modern, self-service, SaaS-based APM solution with fast setup and quick time to value. With the AppPulse suite of products, you can swiftly isolate problems that impact the user experience and drill down to the root cause, so they can be quickly fixed.

Some of the most useful features in AppPulse include:

Crash analytics: Get the information you need to prevent crashes and improve stability.

End-to-end transaction tracing: Trace a user’s interactions down to the code-level. Find out how much time was spent in methods, SQL statements, as well as exceptions.

FunDex: FunDex is a mobile user experience benchmark that gives your app a score that includes each negative application occurrence (i.e. crashing, slowness, etc.). With it, you can figure out where to improve performance and ensure you get the rating you deserve.

And the best part is, you can view this without needing to change any code or add tags to your app.

When you add Mobile Center, you also get an end-to-end quality lab with real devices and emulators.

Now when you launch, you already know how the app will perform, so you can get the 5-star rating you need.

The project will be deemed a success – And the digital team will get high praise from management, instead of blame…

Have you experienced the highs and the lows of launching an app or website? Please share your experiences in the comments below.

Stephen Davis
by Stephen Davis

Stephen Davis is the founder of Calleo Software, a OpenText (formerly Micro Focus) Gold Partner. His passion is to help test professionals improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing.

To view Stephen's LinkedIn profile and connect 

Stephen Davis LinkedIn profile

3rd September 2018
AI for Test Data

How to Implement AI for Test Data: 10 Considerations

Test data has always been one of the slowest, least glamorous parts of software testing. It is rarely strategic work, but it holds everything up. No matter how good your test plan is, weak data can make the whole exercise unreliable.

Choosing Performance

How to Choose a Performance Testing Tool

If you’re looking for a new performance tool or new to performance testing, it can be a tough subject to get your head around. I’ve been involved in the industry for 3 decades, and during that time, it has evolved massively. Increasingly, I talk to people at companies who’ve never

DevWeb is better than JMeter

5 Ways DevWeb Is Better Than JMeter

JMeter often becomes the default because it looks free. There is no license fee, and it appears flexible enough to do almost anything. But JMeter’s ease is often a myth. In reality, it is rarely the most sensible or low-cost choice.

Testing is Vital

Seriously Though, Five Reasons Testing is Vital

In the last main Testing Times edition (April fools day), I argued, quite ludicrously, that testing is a waste of time. That it slows releases, costs money, and ruins everyone’s fun. Judging by the comments, a few readers took it a bit too literally. So let’s be serious for a minute.

Aviator Testing AI

DevOps Aviator: AI Made For Testers

DevOps Aviator brings generative AI into software delivery to help test teams move sooner, reduce manual effort, and get answers faster. It is part of the broader Aviator suite: a set of AI capabilities embedded across OpenText products.

Testing is a waste of time

5 Reasons Testing is a Waste of Time

Let’s be honest, testing is what teams do when they don’t trust their developers. It’s a tax on speed, a relic from waterfall days, and a crutch for people afraid to ship. It just slows down releases, kills creativity, and wastes budget that could be better spent on another sprint.

OpenText Summit 2026

OpenText Summit: Why This Free Event Is Worth Your Time

You walk into a room where people are talking about the exact problems you wrestle with: tricky deployments, clunky processes, and how to test faster. Sometimes, the right conversation with the right person is enough to unlock a solution or a possibility you hadn’t even considered.

Python

Functional Testing 26.1: Adds Python, Cloud Testing, and more AI

With 26.1, OpenText is giving you something concrete: Python‑based automation, AI‑assisted verification, and cloud labs that fit into your existing CI/CD. This turns functional testing from a separate QA activity into a shared capability that developers, SDETs, and testers can all contribute to.

LoadRunner AI

LoadRunner 26.1: A New Direction in Performance Testing?

OpenText’s version 26.1 is a clear statement of where the Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) family is heading: AI-assisted, simplifying complex tasks and enabling your team to be more productive. This creates a very practical question: how do you buy and deploy these new capabilities in a way that actually moves the needle on risk, cost, and delivery speed?

Insights

Search

Related Articles

To get other software testing insights, like this, direct to you inbox join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe 

at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.

Sign up to receive the latest, Software Testing Insights, news and to join the Calleo mailing list.

You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time!

By signing up you consent to receiving regular emails from Calleo with updates, tips and ideas on software testing along with the occasional promotion for software testing products. You can, of course, unsubscribe at any time. Click here for the privacy policy.